4.8 Article

Poly-L-lysine-coated albumin nanoparticles: Stability, mechanism for increasing in vitro enzymatic resilience, and siRNA release characteristics

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 4277-4284

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.017

关键词

BSA; Coacervation; PLL; Coating; siRNA

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Chemical & Materials Engineering Department, University of Alberta, Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enzymatic degradation of nanoparticle (NP)-based drug delivery vehicles is a major factor influencing the administration routes as well as the site-specific delivery of NPs. To understand the stability of albumin NPs in an aggressive proteolytic environment, bovine serum albumin (BSA) NPs were fabricated via a coacervation technique and stabilized by coating using different molecular weights (MWs: 0.9-24 kDa) and concentrations (0.1-1.0 mg ml(-1)) of the cationic polymer, poly-L-lysine (PLL). A short interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) was used as a model drug for encapsulation in the BSA NPs. The generated NPs were characterized for morphology (with atomic force microscopy), size (with photon correlation spectroscopy) and charge (zeta-potential). The size range of formed BSA particles (155 +/- 11 to 3800 +/- 1600 nm) was effectively controlled by the MW and concentration of the PLL used for coating. The aqueous solution stability of NPs increased with an increasing MW and PLL concentration. However, in the presence of trypsin, NPs coated with higher MW PLL were not as stable as those formed using lower MW PLL. This trend was also confirmed based on the release pattern of siRNA in the presence of trypsin. We conclude that, when designing stabilizing coatings for soft protein-based NPs, smaller molecules may be more suitable for particle coating if enhanced proteolytic resistance and more stable NPs are desired for targeted drug delivery applications. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据