4.8 Article

On the biodegradation performance of an Mg-Y-RE alloy with various surface conditions in simulated body fluid

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 162-171

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.034

关键词

Magnesium biodegradation; Simulated body fluid; Surface conditions; Oxide layer; Yttrium depletion

资金

  1. Austrian Forschungsforderungsgesellschaft (FFG)
  2. state of Upper Austria
  3. Austrian Research Centers GmbH (ARC)
  4. Staub/Kaiser Foundation, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study documents the influence of different surface conditions produced by various heat treatments on the in vitro degradation performance of an Mg-Y-RE alloy (WE43) investigated by immersion in simulated body fluid. WE43 samples were, respectively (i) annealed at 525 degrees C (plus artificial aging at 250 degrees C in one case) and afterwards polished; and (ii) polished, annealed at 500 degrees C in air and subsequently investigated in the oxidized state. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicates a mass gain during oxidation in air, following a square-root law over time. X-ray diffraction spectra imply a growing Y(2)O(3) layer upon oxidation, and Auger electron spectroscopy depth profiles show an increased oxide layer thickness which develops according to the behavior observed by TGA. Macroscopically, the degradation performance of the differently heat-treated samples can be divided into two groups. Annealed and polished samples show a fast and homogeneous degradation which slows with time. Their degradation behavior is approximated by a parabolic law. Oxidized samples exhibit a slow initial degradation rate which increases when the protection of the oxide layer is reduced. Overall, they reveal a sigmoidal degradation behavior. Here the differing degradation performances of the annealed-polished and the oxidized samples are related to the different surface conditions and explained on the basis of a depletion hypothesis. (C) 2008 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据