4.0 Article

EFFECTS OF CADMIUM STRESS ON ROOT Tip CELLS AND SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL INDEXES IN ALLIUM CEPA VAR. AGROGARUM L.

期刊

ACTA BIOLOGICA CRACOVIENSIA SERIES BOTANICA
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 129-141

出版社

POLSKA AKAD NAUK, POLISH ACAD SCIENCES, PAS BRANCH CRACOW
DOI: 10.2478/v10182-012-0015-x

关键词

Cadmium; chromosome aberration; mineral metabolism; antioxidative enzymes; Allium cepa var. agrogarum L.

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Science and Technology Development Foundation Program of the University in Tianjin [20110603, 20100606]
  3. Tianjin Normal University [52XB1105]
  4. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cytogenetic and Molecular Regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allium cepa var. agrogarum L. seedlings grown in nutrient solution were subjected to increasing concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 1, 10, 100 mu M). Variation in tolerance to cadmium toxicity was studied based on chromosome aberrations, nucleoli structure and reconstruction of root tip cells. Cd accumulation and mineral metabolism, lipid peroxidation, and changes in the antioxidative defense system (SOD, CAT, POD) in leaves and roots of the seedlings. Cd induced chromosome aberrations including C-mitoses, chromosome bridges, chromosome fragments and chromosome stickiness. Cd induced the production of some particles of argyrophilic proteins scattered in the nuclei and even extruded from the nucleoli into the cytoplasm after a high Cd concentration or prolonged Cd stress, and nucleolar reconstruction was inhibited. In Cd2+-treated Allium cepa var. agrogarum plants the metal was largely restricted to the roots; very little of it was transported to aerial parts. Adding Cd2+ to the nutrient solution affected mineral metabolism. For example, at 100 mu M Cd it reduced the levels of Mn, Cu and Zn in roots, bulbs and leaves. Malondialdehyde content in roots and leaves increased with treatment time and increased concentration of Cd. Antioxidant enzymes appear to play a key role in resistance to Cd under stress conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据