4.2 Article

Outcomes in smokers and alcohol users after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty

期刊

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 631-638

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12086

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation, Hellerup, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Smoking and alcohol use impair post-operative outcomes. However, no studies include fast-track surgery, which is a multimodal-enhanced recovery programme demonstrated to improve outcome. We hypothesised that outcome is similar in smokers and alcohol users as in non-users after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods Prospective questionnaires on co-morbidity and smoking/alcohol use were cross-referenced with the Danish National Health Registry to investigate relationship between smoking/alcohol use and length of stay of >4 days and readmissions 90 days after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Results In 3041 consecutive patients, 458 reported smoking and 216 drinking >2 drinks a day, of which 66 did both. Smokers/alcohol users were younger than non-users (mean age: 64.3 vs. 68.0 years, P<0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed no relation between length of stay of >4 days and smoking (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], P) (1.34 [0.921.95], 0.127) or alcohol use (0.59 [0.301.16], 0.127). Thirty- and ninety-day readmission rate was 6.6% (n=201) and 9.4% (n=285). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed an increased risk of readmissions in smokers at 30 (1.60 [1.052.44], 0.028) but not 90-day follow-up (1.17 [0.801.73], 0.419). No increased risk of readmissions was found in alcohol users at 30 (0.94 [0.501.76], 0.838) or 90-day follow-up (0.83 [0.471.49], 0.532). No increased risk of specific readmissions (i.e. wound infections or pneumonia) typically related to smoking/alcohol use was found in smokers (1.56 [0.932.62], 0.091) or alcohol users (1.00 [0.472.15], 0.999) at 90-day follow-up. Conclusion Influence of smoking or alcohol use may be less pronounced in fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty compared with data with conventional care programmes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据