4.2 Article

Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study

期刊

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1013-1019

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02737.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated the effect of the predominantly sensory adductor-canal-blockade on established pain in the early post-operative period after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesised that the adductor-canal-blockade would reduce pain during flexion of the knee (primary end point) and at rest, as well as reducing morphine consumption and morphine-related side effects (secondary outcomes) compared with placebo. Methods: We enrolled patients scheduled for elective TKA into this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study. During general anaesthesia, we placed a catheter in the adductor canal, and after obtaining pre-block pain scores 30?min post-operatively, we injected 30?ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (n?=?21) or saline (n?=?20) according to randomisation. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01261897. Results: Forty-two patients were randomised, and 41 were analysed. Mean (standard deviation) pain scores during flexion of the knee at 1?h post-operatively were 58 (22) mm and 67 (29) mm, ropivacaine and placebo group, respectively (P?=?0.23) but was significantly reduced in the ropivacaine group when calculated as area under the curve for the interval 16?h (P?=?0.02). There were no statistically significant differences regarding pain at rest (P?=?0.08), morphine consumption (P?=?0.06), nor morphine-related side effects, apart from nausea (P?=?0.04). Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study shows promising results regarding the analgesic efficacy of adductor-canal-blockade in post-operative pain treatment after TKA, with a significant reduction in pain during flexion of the knee in the early post-operative period compared with placebo. However, the study was not sufficiently powered to permit final conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据