3.9 Article

Implementation of a Full-Scale Anammox-Based Facility to Treat an Anaerobic Digestion Sidestream at the Alexandria Sanitation Authority Water Resource Facility

期刊

WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2011.033

关键词

anammox; nitrogen removal; sidestream; anaerobic digestion; centrate; Universal Tank

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 204,000 m(3)/day Alexandria Sanitation Authority (ASA) Water Resource Facility (WRF) is currently being upgraded to meet an annual average total nitrogen (TN) waste load based on a concentration of 3 mg/L at its current design capacity. The State-of-the-Art-Nutrient-Upgrade-Program (SANUP) includes a system to treat the high nitrogen solids handling sidestream from dewatering anaerobically digested solids. The centrate pretreatment (CPT) system is being implemented as a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) capable of operating in three modes: (1) nitrification/denitrification, (2) nitritation/denitritation, and (3) partial nitritation/Anammox according to the Universal Tank concept. The design concept and basis for the facility are presented, along with the physical layout. It is being implemented using a conventional design-bid-build approach. Design is complete and construction is currently in the bid phase. Construction is expected to begin in the second quarter of 2011 and to be complete by December 2012. The estimated construction cost is $US 14.1 million. The design incorporates a number of innovations, including: (1) accounting for variations in process loading and anticipated operating modes over the life of the facility, (2) provision of a 10 percent capacity daughter reactor to facilitate process optimization and testing, and (3) inclusion of a cyclone to selectively retain the slow growing Anammox bacteria. It is anticipated that the facility will start up in the nitritation/denitritation mode, while the daughter reactor is used to acclimate biomass and finalize the operating strategy for the partial nitritation/Anammox mode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据