4.2 Article

Effects of pain stimulation on bispectral index, heart rate and blood pressure at different minimal alveolar concentration values of sevoflurane

期刊

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 420-426

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01569.x

关键词

bispectral index (BIS); pain stimulation; sevoflurane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of the present study was to examine the level of unconsciousness measured with bispectral index (BIS) at different minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) levels of sevoflurane, and to study the hemodynamic and BIS reactions during noxious stimulation with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and an ice water pain test (IWP). Methods: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee and was performed on 10 healthy, young volunteers (six males and four females), ASA physical status 1. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in an oxygen/air mixture. The volunteers were spontaneously breathing, but if necessary, ventilation was mechanically supported. TENS and IWP were performed at 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 MAC of sevoflurane. Results: At 1.0 MAC, there was a significant increase in BIS during pain stimulation both with IWP (P < 0.03) and with TENS (P < 0.005), but at 1.5 MAC there were no changes. A marked variation in BIS was seen at 2.0 MAC, with periods of burst suppression and periods of high BIS values despite clinical signs of deep anesthesia. These marked variations in BIS were seen before, during and after pain stimulation. One volunteer (# 8) had a short episode of convulsions at 2.0 MAC. Conclusion: BIS, heart rate and blood pressure increased during pain stimulation at 1.0 MAC but not at 1.5 MAC of sevoflurane. There was a remarkable variation in BIS at 2.0 MAC of sevoflurane, with BIS values indicating wakefulness despite clinical signs of deep anesthesia. This BIS variation is probably caused by epileptogenic activity due to sevoflurane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据