4.8 Article

Thiadiazolo[3,4-c]pyridine as an Acceptor toward Fast-Switching Green Donor-Acceptor-Type Electrochromic Polymer with Low Bandgap

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 21, 页码 11089-11098

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01188

关键词

donor acceptor-type conjugated polymers; green electrochromics; PEDOT; thiadiazolo[3,4-dpyridine; low bandgap

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51303073, 51463008]
  2. Ganpo Outstanding Talents 555 projects
  3. Training Plan for the Main Subject of Academic Leaders of Jiangxi Province
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20122BAB216011, 20142BAB216029]
  5. Science and Technology Landing Plan of Universities in Jiangxi Province [KJLD12081]
  6. Provincial Projects for Postgraduate Innovation in Jiangxi [YC2014-S441, YC2014-S431]
  7. Scientific Research Projects of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University [2014QNBJRC003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thiadiazolo[3,4-c]pyridine (PT), an important analog of benzothiadiazole (BT), has most recently been explored as a novel electron acceptor. It exhibits more electron-accepting ability and other unique properties and potential advantages over BT, thus inspiring us to investigate PT-based donoracceptor-type (DA) conjugated polymer in electrochromics. Herein, PT was employed for the rational design of novel donoracceptor-type systems to yield a neutral green electrochromic polymer poly(4,7-di(2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)-[1,2,5] thiadiazolo[3,4-c]pyridine) (PEPTE). PEPTE revealed a lower bandgap (E-g,E-ele = 0.85 eV, E-g,E-opt = 1.12 eV) than its BT analog and also favorable redox activity and stability. Furthermore, electrochromic kinetic studies demonstrated that PEPTE displayed higher coloration efficiency than BT analog, good optical memory, and very fast switching time (0.3 s at all three wavelengths), indicating that PT would probably be a promising choice for developing novel neutral green electrochromic polymers by matching with various donor units.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据