4.1 Review

Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review

期刊

GLOBAL HEALTH PROMOTION
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 45-48

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1757975910383936

关键词

barriers to participatory research; community-based participatory research; integrative approach; participatory research; systematic review; realist review; research design

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Participatory research (PR) experts believe that increased community and stakeholder participation in research augments program pertinence, quality, outcome, sustainability, uptake, and transferability. There is, however, a dearth of assessments and measurement tools to demonstrate the contribution of participation in health research and interventions. One systematic review of PR, conducted for the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ), provided no conclusive evidence concerning the benefits of community participation to enhance research and health outcomes. To overcome methodological gaps and barriers of the AHRQ review, we propose to conduct a systematic realist review, which can be understood as a theory-driven qualitative review capable of capturing the often complex, diffuse and obtuse evidence concerning participation. Reviewing how PR mechanisms and contextual factors mediate and moderate outcomes, the review will generate and test hypotheses (middle-range theories) conceptualizing the benefits of participation and will portray the manner and circumstances in which participation influences outcomes. (Global Health Promotion, 2011; 18(2): 45-48)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据