4.8 Article

Erythrocyte Membrane Cloaked Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticle as Biomimetic Nanoreactor for Starvation-Activated Colon Cancer Therapy

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 10201-10211

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05200

关键词

erythrocyte membrane; metal-organic framework; glucose oxidase; biomimetic nanoreactor; starvation-activated therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21871249, 21820102009, 21533008, 21673223, 21431007, 21601175]
  2. Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Project [20160520129JH, 20170101184JC]
  3. Key Program of Frontier of Sciences [CAS QYZDJ-SSW-SLH052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shutting down glucose supply by glucose oxidase (GOx) to starve tumors has been considered to be an attractive strategy in cancerous starvation therapy. Nevertheless, the in vivo applications of GOx-based starvation therapy are severely restricted by the poor GOx delivery efficiency and the self-limiting therapeutic effect. Herein, a biomimetic nanoreactor has been fabricated for starvation-activated cancer therapy by encapsulating GOx and prodrug tirapazamine (TPZ) in an erythrocyte membrane cloaked metal-organic framework (MOF) nanoparticle (TGZ@eM). The fabricated TGZ@eM nanoreactor can assist the delivery of GOx to tumor cells and then exhaust endogenous glucose and O-2 to starve tumors efficiently. Importantly, the resulting tumor hypoxia by GOx-based starvation therapy further initiates the activation of TPZ, which is released from the nanoreactor in the acid lyso/endosome environment, for enhanced colon cancer therapy. More importantly, by integrating the biomimetic surface modification, the immunity-escaping and prolonged blood circulation characteristics endow our nanoreactor dramatically improved cancer targeting ability. The in vitro and in vivo outcomes indicate our biomimetic nanoreactor exhibits a strong synergistic cascade effect for colon cancer therapy in an accurate and facile manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据