4.8 Article

Electrically Controllable Single-Point Covalent Functionalization of Spin-Cast Carbon-Nanotube Field-Effect Transistor Arrays

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 9922-9930

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b03073

关键词

carbon nanotube; spin-cast; wafer scale; CNTFET array; smFET; diazonium; single-point defect; DNA melting

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [U19AI109761]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01HG006882]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM107417]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI109761] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM107417] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-point-functionalized carbon-nanotube field-effect transistors (CNTFETs) have been used to sense conformational changes and binding events in protein and nucleic acid structures from intrinsic molecular charge. The key to utilizing these devices as single-molecule sensors is the ability to attach a single probe molecule to an individual device. In contrast, with noncovalent attachment approaches such as those based on van der Waals interactions, covalent attachment approaches generally deliver higher stability but have traditionally been more difficult to control, resulting in low yield. Here, we present a single-point-functionalization method for CNTFET arrays based on electrochemical control of a diazonium reaction to create sp(3) defects, combined with a scalable spin-casting method for fabricating large arrays of devices on arbitrary substrates. Attachment of probe DNA to the functionalized device enables single-molecule detection of DNA hybridization with complementary target, verifying the single-point functionalization. Overall, this method enables single-point defect generation with 80% yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据