4.8 Article

Fast, Noncontact, Wafer-Scale, Atomic Layer Resolved Imaging of Two-Dimensional Materials by Ellipsometric Contrast Micrography

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 8555-8563

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b04167

关键词

ellipsometry; graphene; h-BN; 2D material characterization; chemical vapor deposition; wafer-scale mapping

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/K016636/1, EP/PS1021X/1]
  2. EPSRC Cambridge NanoDTC [EP/G037221/1]
  3. EPSRC Doctoral Training Award [EP/M506485/1]
  4. German Research Foundation [INST 196/10-1 FUGG]
  5. EPSRC [EP/P51021X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adequate characterization and quality control of atomically thin layered materials (2DM) has become a serious challenge particularly given the rapid advancements in their large area manufacturing and numerous emerging industrial applications with different substrate requirements. Here, we focus on ellipsometric contrast micrography (ECM), a fast intensity mode within spectroscopic imaging ellipsometry, and show that it can be effectively used for noncontact, large area characterization of 2DM to map coverage, layer number, defects and contamination. We demonstrate atomic layer resolved, quantitative mapping of chemical vapor deposited graphene layers on Si/SiO2-wafers, but also on rough Cu catalyst foils, highlighting that ECM is applicable to all application relevant substrates. We discuss the optimization of ECM parameters for high throughput characterization. While the lateral resolution can be less than 1 pm, we particularly explore fast scanning and demonstrate imaging of a 4 '' graphene wafer in 47 min at 10 mu m lateral resolution, i.e., an imaging speed of 1.7 cm(2)/min. Furthermore, we show ECM of monolayer hexagonal BN (h-BN) and of h-BN/graphene bilayers, highlighting that ECM is applicable to a wide range of 2D layered structures that have previously been very challenging to characterize and thereby fills an important gap in 2DM metrology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据