4.8 Article

Electron Transfer Kinetics on Mono- and Multilayer Graphene

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 10089-10100

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn504298r

关键词

graphene; graphite; basal plane; electron transfer; kinetics; electrochemistry; voltammetry

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/I005145/1, EP/K039547/1, EP/K016954/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K016954/1, EP/K039547/1, EP/I005145/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039547/1, EP/K016954/1, EP/I005145/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding of the electrochemical properties of graphene, especially the electron transfer kinetics of a redox reaction between the graphene surface and a molecule, in comparison to graphite or other carbon-based materials, is essential for its potential in energy conversion and storage to be realized. Here we use voltammetric determination of the electron transfer rate for three redox mediators, ferricyanide, hexaammineruthenium, and hexachloroiridate (Fe(CN)(6)(3-), Ru(NH3)(6)(3+), and IrCl62-, respectively), to measure the reactivity of graphene samples prepared by mechanical exfoliation of natural graphite. Electron transfer rates are measured for varied number of graphene layers (1 to ca. 1000 layers) using microscopic droplets. The basal planes of mono- and multilayer graphene, supported on an insulating Si/SiO2 substrate, exhibit significant electron transfer activity and changes in kinetics are observed for all three mediators. No significant trend in kinetics with flake thickness is discernible for each mediator; however, a large variation in kinetics is observed across the basal plane of the same flakes, indicating that local surface conditions affect the electrochemical performance. This is confirmed by in situ graphite exfoliation, which reveals significant deterioration of initially, near-reversible kinetics for Ru(NH3)(6)(3+) when comparing the atmosphere-aged and freshly exfoliated graphite surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据