4.8 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Crystalline Graphene Aerogels

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 11013-11022

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn505335u

关键词

aerogel; graphene

资金

  1. UC Lab Fees Research Program [12-LR-235323]
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory through LDRD [13-LW-099]
  4. National Science Foundation under the Center of Integrated Nanomechanical Systems [EEC-0832819]
  5. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. National Center for Electron Microscopy of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [DE-AC02-05CH11231, 1770]
  7. Office of Science, OBES of the US DoE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerogels are used in a broad range of scientific and industrial applications due to their large surface areas, ultrafine pore sizes, and extremely low densities. Recently, a large number of reports have described graphene aerogels based on the reduction of graphene oxide (GO). Though these GO-based aerogels represent a considerable advance relative to traditional carbon aerogels, they remain significantly inferior to individual graphene sheets due to their poor crystallinity. Here, we report a straightforward method to synthesize highly crystalline GO-based graphene aerogels via high-temperature processing common in commercial graphite production. The crystallization of the graphene aerogels versus annealing temperature is characterized using Raman and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and electron microscopy. Nitrogen porosimetry shows that the highly crystalline graphene macrostructure maintains a high surface area and ultrafine pore size. Because of their enhanced crystallinity, these graphene aerogels exhibit a similar to 200 degrees C improvement in oxidation temperature and an order of magnitude increase in electrical conductivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据