4.8 Article

Insights into the Cellular Response Triggered by Silver Nanoparticles Using Quantitative Proteomics

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 2161-2175

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn4050744

关键词

iTRAQ; silver nanoparticles; proteomics; cytotoxicity; mass spectrometry; sumoylation; ubiquitination

资金

  1. INTERREG 4A Syddanmark-Schleswig-K.E.R.N.
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research, Natural Sciences (FNU grant) [FK272-08-0044]
  3. Villum Fonden [00007268] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of nanoparticles in foods, materials, and clinical treatments has increased dramatically in the past decade. Because of the possibility of human exposure to nanoparticles, there is an urgent need to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular responses that might be triggered. Such information is necessary to assess potential health risks arising from the use of nanoparticles, and for developing new formulations of next generation nanoparticles for clinical treatments. Using mass spectrometry-based proteomic technologies and complementary techniques (e.g., Western blotting and confocal laser scanning microscopy), we present insights into the silver nanoparticle-protein interaction in the human LoVo cell line. Our data indicate that some unique cellular processes are driven by the size. The 100 nm nanoparticles exerted indirect effects via serine/threonine protein kinase (PAK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and phosphatase 2A pathways, and the 20 nm nanoparticles induced direct effects on cellular stress, including generation of reactive oxygen species and protein carbonylation. In addition, we report that proteins involved in SUMOylation were up-regulated after exposure to 20 nm silver nanoparticles. These results were further substantiated by the observation of silver nanoparticles entering the cells; however, data indicate that this was determined by the size of the nanoparticles, since 20 nm particles entered the cells while 100 nm particles did not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据