4.8 Article

Vapor-Phase Polymerization of Nanofibrillar Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for Supercapacitors

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 1500-1510

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn405595r

关键词

supercapacitor; vapor-phase polymerization; poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene); nanofibers; conducting polymer

资金

  1. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Visiting Scholars Program
  2. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research (NCI) [2P30CA014051-39]
  3. Koch Institute's Peterson Nanotechnology Materials Core Facilities
  4. Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology facilities (U.S. Army Research Office) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology [W911NF-07-D-0004]
  5. Boeing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructures of the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) with large surface areas enhance the performance of energy storage devices such as electrochemical supercapacitors. However, until now, high aspect ratio nanofibers of this polymer could only be deposited from the vapor-phase, utilizing extrinsic hard templates such as electrospun nanofibers and anodized aluminum oxide. These routes result in low conductivity and require postsynthetic template removal, conditions that stifle the development of conducting polymer electronics. Here we introduce a simple process that overcomes these drawbacks and results in vertically directed high aspect ratio poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanofibers possessing a high conductivity of 130 S/cm. Nanofibers deposit as a freestanding mechanically robust film that is easily processable into a supercapacitor without using organic binders or conductive additives and is characterized by excellent cycling stability, retaining more than 92% of its initial capacitance after 10 000 charge/discharge cycles. Deposition of nanofibers on a hard carbon fiber paper current collector affords a highly efficient and stable electrode for a supercapacitor exhibiting gravimetric capacitance of 175 F/g and 94% capacitance retention after 1000 cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据