4.8 Article

Self-Titrating Anticoagulant Nanocomplexes That Restore Homeostatic Regulation of the Coagulation Cascade

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 8776-8785

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn501129q

关键词

nanomedicine; anticoagulation; protease; stimuli-responsive; self-regulation

资金

  1. NIH [BRP: R01CA124427-01]
  2. NIH/NCI [U54CA119349, U54CA119335]
  3. Alliance Challenge Project/MIT-Harvard Center of Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence [U54CA151884]
  4. Packard Fellowship [1999-1453]
  5. Marie-D. & Pierre Casimir-Lambert Fund
  6. Koch Institute from the National Cancer Institute [P30-CA14051]
  7. CCNE [5 U54 CA151884-03]
  8. NIH MSTP program [T32GM007753]
  9. Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award [F32CA159496-02]
  10. Burroughs Wellcome Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antithrombotic therapy is a critical portion of the treatment regime for a number of life-threatening conditions, including cardiovascular disease, stroke, and cancer; yet, proper clinical management of anticoagulation remains a challenge because existing agents increase the propensity for bleeding in patients. Here, we describe the development of a bioresponsive peptide-polysaccharide nanocomplex that utilizes a negative feedback mechanism to self-titrate the release of anticoagulant in response to varying levels of coagulation activity. This nanoscale self-titrating activatable therapeutic, or narroSTAT, consists of a cationic thrombin-cleavable peptide and heparin, an anionic polysaccharide and widely used clinical anticoagulant. Under nonthrombotic conditions, nanoSTATs circulate inactively, neither releasing anticoagulant nor significantly prolonging bleeding time. However, in response to life-threatening pulmonary embolism, nanoSTATs locally release their drug payload and prevent thrombosis. This autonomous negative feedback regulator may improve antithrombotic therapy by increasing the therapeutic window and decreasing the bleeding risk of anticoagulants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据