4.8 Article

Hyperthermia-Mediated Local Drug Delivery by a Bubble-Generating Liposomal System for Tumor-Specific Chemotherapy

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 5105-5115

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn501162x

关键词

thermoresponsive liposome; triggered release; local drug delivery; doxorubicin; biodistribution

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan [NSC 101-2120-M-007-015-CC1, NSC 101-2221-E-182-002-MY3]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Linkou, Taiwan) [CMRP391513, CMRPG3A0512]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As is widely suspected, lysolipid dissociation from liposomes contributes to the intravenous instability of ThermoDox (lysolipid liposomes), thereby impeding its antitumor efficacy. This work evaluates the feasibility of a thermoresponsive bubble-generating liposomal system without lysolipids for tumor-specific chemotherapy. The key component in this liposomal formulation is its encapsulated ammonium bicarbonate (ABC), which is used to actively load doxorubicin (DOX) into liposomes and trigger a drug release when heated locally. Incubating ABC liposomes with whole blood results in a significantly smaller decrease in the retention of encapsulated DOX than that by lysolipid liposomes, indicating superior plasma stability. Biodistribution analysis results indicate that the ABC formulation circulates longer than its lysolipid counterpart. Following the injection of ABC liposome suspension Into mice with tumors heated locally, decomposition of the ABC encapsulated in liposomes facilitates the immediate thermal activation of CO2 bubble generation, subsequently increasing the intratumoral DOX accumulation. Consequently, the antitumor efficacy of the ABC liposomes is superior to that of their lysolipid counterparts. Results of this study demonstrate that this thermoresponsive bubble-generating liposomal system is a highly promising carrier for tumor-specific chemotherapy, especially for local drug delivery mediated at hyperthermic temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据