4.8 Article

Superlubric Sliding of Graphene Nanoflakes on Graphene

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 1718-1724

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn305722d

关键词

graphene nanoflakes; sliding; superlubricity; incommensurability; scanning tunneling microscopy

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering of the U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. WCU (World Class University) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [R-31-2008-000-10055-0]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [KRF-2010-0005390]
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [N01130013] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2012-000-10055-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lubricating properties of graphite and graphene have been Intensely studied by sliding a frictional force microscope tip against them to understand the origin of the observed low friction. In contrast, the relative motion of free graphene layers remains poorly understood. Here we report a study of the sliding behavior of graphene nanoflakes (GNFs) on a graphene surface. Using scanning tunneling microscopy, we found that the GNFs show facile translational and rotational motions between commensurate initial and final states at temperatures as low as 5 K. The motion is initiated by a tip-induced transition of the flakes from a commensurate to an Incommensurate registry with the underlying graphene layer (the superlubric state), followed by rapid sliding until another commensurate position is reached. Counterintuitively, the average sliding distance of the flakes is larger at 5 K than at 77 K, indicating that thermal fluctuations are likely to trigger their transitions from superlubric back to commensurate ground states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据