4.8 Article

Noninvasive Photodetachment of Stem Cells on Tunable Conductive Polymer Nano Thin Films: Selective Harvesting and Preserved Differentiation Capacity

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 4119-4128

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn400405t

关键词

cell harvesting; conductive polymer thin film; photothermal effect; cell engineering; stem cell

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. Korean government (MEST) through the Active Polymer Center for Pattern Integration [R11-2007-050-00000-0]
  3. Pioneer Research Center Program [2011-0001672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Viable mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were efficiently and selectively harvested by near-infrared (NIR) light using the photothermal effect of a conductive polymer nano thin film. The poly(3,4-ethylenedioxy thiophene) (PEDOT)-coated cell culture surfaces were prepared via a simple and fast solution-casting polymerization (SCP) technique. The absorption of PEDOT thin films in the NIR region was effectively triggered cell harvesting upon exposure to an NIR source. By controlling the NIR absorption of the PEDOT film through electrochemical doping or growing PEDOT with different thin film thickness from 70 to 300 nm, the proliferation and harvesting of MSCs on the PEDOT surface were controlled quantitatively. This light-induced cell detachment method based on PEDOT films provides the temporal and spatial control of cell harvesting, as well as cell patterning. The harvested stem cells were found to be alive and well proliferated despite the use of temperature increase by NIR. More importantly, the harvested MSCs by this method preserved their intrinsic characteristics as well as multilineage differentiation capacities. This PEDOT surfaces could be used for repetitive culture and detachment of MSCs or for efficient selection or depletion of a specific subset from heterogeneous population during culture of various tissue-derived cells because there were no photodegradation and photobreakage In the PEDOT films by NIR exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据