4.8 Article

Scanning-Raman-Microscopy for the Statistical Analysis of Covalently Functionalized Graphene

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 5472-5482

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn401481h

关键词

graphene; Raman; covalent functionalization; intercalation compounds; Raman statistics

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [A1]
  2. Interdisciplinary Center for Molecular Materials (ICMM)
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [246622 GRAPHENOCHEM]
  4. Graduate School Molecular Science (GSMS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the introduction of a systematic method for the quantitative and reliable characterization of covalently functionalized graphene based on Scanning-Raman-Microscopy (SRM). This allows for recording and analyzing several thousands of Raman spectra per sample and straightforward display of various Raman properties and their correlations with each other in histograms or coded 2D-plots. In this way, information about the functionalization efficiency of a given reaction, the reproducibility of the statistical analysis, and the sample homogeneity can be easily deduced. Based on geometric considerations, we were also able to provide, for the first time, a correlation between the mean defect distance of densely packed point defects and the Raman I-D/I-G ratio directly obtained from the statistical analysis. This proved to be the prerequisite for determining the degree of functionalization, termed theta. As model compounds, we have studied a series of arylated graphenes (GPh) for which we have developed new synthetic procedures. Both graphite and graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) were used as starting materials. The best route toward GPh consisted of the initial reduction of graphite with a Na/K alloy in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) as it yields the highest overall homogeneity of products reflected in the widths of the Raman I-D/I-G histograms. The Raman results correlate nicely with parallel thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据