4.8 Article

A Systematic Analysis of Peptide Linker Length and Liposomal Polyethylene Glycol Coating on Cellular Uptake of Peptide-Targeted Liposomes

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 2935-2947

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn305663e

关键词

ligand-targeted liposome; polyethylene glycol; HER2; VLA-4; peptide-targeted liposome; peptide linker; cellular uptake

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PEGylated liposomes are attractive pharmaceutical nano-carriers; however, literature reports of ligand-targeted nanopartides have not consistently shown successful results. Here, we employed a multifaceted synthetic strategy to prepare peptide-targeted liposomal nanopartides with high purity, reproducibility, and precisely controlled stoichiometry of functionalities to evaluate the role of liposomal PEG coating, peptide EG-linker length, and peptide valency on cellular uptake in a systematic manner. We analyzed these parameters in two distinct disease models where the liposomes were functionalized with either HER2- or VLA-4-antagonistic peptides to target HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells or VLA-4-overexpressing myeloma cells, respectively. When targeting peptides were tethered to nanopartides with an EG45 (similar to PEG2000) linker in a manner similar to a more traditional formulation, their cellular uptake was not enhanced compared to non-targeted versions regardless of the liposomal PEG coating used. Conversely, reduction of the liposomal PEG to PEG350 and the peptide linker to EG12 dramatically enhanced cellular uptake by similar to 9 fold and similar to 100 fold in the breast cancer and multiple myeloma cells, respectively. Uptake efficiency reached a maximum and a plateau with similar to 2% peptide density in both disease models. Taken together, these results demonstrate the significance of using the right design elements such as the appropriate peptide EG-linker length in coordination with the appropriate liposomal PEG coating and optimal ligand density in efficient cellular uptake of liposomal nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据