4.8 Article

Tough Germanium Nanoparticles under Electrochemical Cycling

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 3427-3433

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn400330h

关键词

lithium-ion battery; fracture; anisotropic lithiation strain; in situ transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. NSF [CMMI-1100205, 1201058]
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) project at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)
  3. Nanostructures for Electrical Energy Storage (NEES), an Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC)
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DESC0001160]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1201058, 1100205] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [GRANTS:13884960] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanical degradation of the electrode materials during electrochemical cycling remains a serious issue that critically limits the capacity retention and cyclability of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Here we report the highly reversible expansion and contraction of germanium nanoparticles under lithiation-delithiation cycling with in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). During multiple cycles to the full capacity, the germanium nanoparticles remained robust without any visible cracking despite similar to 260% volume changes, in contrast to the size-dependent fracture of silicon nanoparticles upon the first lithiation. The comparative in situ TEM study of fragile silicon nanoparticles suggests that the tough behavior of germanium nanoparticles can be attributed to the weak anisotropy of the lithiation strain at the reaction front. The tough germanium nanoparticles offer substantial potential for the development of durable, high-capacity, and high-rate anodes for advanced lithium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据