4.8 Article

In Situ Plasmonic Counter for Polymerization of Chains of Gold Nanorods in Solution

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 5901-5910

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn402363p

关键词

self-assembly; plasmonic polymers; gold nanorods; aggregation number; extinction spectra; simulations

资金

  1. NSERC Canada
  2. Strategic Network for Bioplasmonic Systems Biopsys Grant
  3. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  4. Jilin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-assembly of gold nanorods (NRs) in linear, polymer-like chains offers the ability to test and validate theoretical models of molecular polymerization. Practically, NR chains show multiple promising applications in sensing of chemical and biological species. Both areas of research can strongly benefit from the development of a quantitative tool for characterization of the structure of NR chains in the course of self-assembly, based on the change in ensemble-averaged optical properties of plasmonic polymers; however, quantitative correlation between the extinction spectra and the structural characteristics of NR chains has not been reported. Here, we report such a tool by a quantitatively correlating the red shift of the longitudinal surface plasmon band of gold NRs and the average aggregation number of NR chains. The generality of the method is demonstrated for NRs with different aspect ratios, for varying inter-rod distances in the chains, and for varying initial concentrations of NRs in solution. We modeled the extinction spectra of the NR chains by combining the theory of step-growth polymerization with finite-difference time-domain simulations and a resistor-inductor-capacitor model, and obtained agreement between the theoretical and experimental results. In addition to capturing quantitatively the ensemble physics of the polymerization, the proposed plasmonic counter approach provides a real-time cost- and labor-efficient method for the characterization of self-assembly of plasmonic polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据