4.8 Review

Electrochemical Immunosensors for Detection of Cancer Protein Biomarkers

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 6546-6561

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn3023969

关键词

biomarkers; electrochemistry immunoassay; amplification; microfluidics; nanomaterials; multiplexing

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. International Cooperative Program of the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81028009]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences Professorship for Senior International Scientists [2011T2J06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioanalytical methods have experienced unprecedented growth in recent years, driven in large part by the need for faster, more sensitive, more portable (point of care) systems to detect protein biomarkers for clinical diagnosis. Electrochemical detection strategies, used in conjunction with immunosensors, offer advantages because they are fast, simple, and low cost. Recent developments in electrochemical immunosensors have significantly improved the sensitivity needed to detect low concentrations of biomarkers present in early stages of cancer. Moreover, the coupling of electrochemical devices with nanomaterials, such as gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, magnetic particles, and quantum dots, offers multiplexing capability for simultaneous measurements of multiple cancer biomarkers. This review will discuss recent advances in the development of electrochemical immunosensors for the next generation of cancer diagnostics, with an emphasis on opportunities for further improvement in cancer diagnostics and treatment monitoring. Details will be given for strategies to increase sensitivity through multilabel amplification, coupled with high densities of capture molecules on sensor surfaces. Such sensors are capable of detecting a wide range of protein quantities, from nanogram to femtogram (depending on the protein biomarkers of interest), in a single sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据