4.8 Article

Dispersions of Non-Covalently Functionalized Graphene with Minimal Stabilizer

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 8857-8867

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn302784m

关键词

graphene; pyrene derivative; pi-pi stacking; zeta potential; nanocomposite

资金

  1. NSF [MRI 04-511]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET-1032330]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research Young Investigator Program [AFOSR FA9550-11-1-0027]
  4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US. Department of Energy [2011-230]
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1032330] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate that functionalized pyrene derivatives effectively stabilize single- and few-layer graphene flakes in aqueous dispersions. The graphene/stabilizer yield obtained by this method is exceptionally high relative to conventional nanomaterial stabilizers such as surfactants or polymers. The mechanism of stabilization by pyrene derivatives is investigated by studying the effects of various parameters on dispersed graphene concentration and stability; these parameters include stabilizer concentration, initial graphite concentration, solution pH, and type and number of functional groups and counterions. The effectiveness of the pyrene derivatives is pH-tunable, as measured by zeta potential, and is also a function of the number of functional groups, the electronegativity of the functional group, the counterion, the relative polarity between stabilizer and solvent, and the distance from the functional group to the basal plane. Even if the dispersion is destabilized by extreme pH or lyophilization, the graphene does not aggregate because the stabilizer remains adsorbed on the surface. These dispersions also show promise for applications in graphene/polymer nanocomposites (examined in this paper), organic solar cells, conductive films, and inkjet-printed electronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据