4.8 Article

Tailor-Made Magnetic Fe3O4@mTiO2 Microspheres with a Tunable Mesoporous Anatase Shell for Highly Selective and Effective Enrichment of Phosphopeptides

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 3179-3188

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn3009646

关键词

mesoporous microspheres; magnetic clusters; titanium oxide; enrichment of phosphopeptides; mass spectrometric analysis

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Key Project of China [2012CB910602]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [20974023, 21025519, 21128001, 51073040]
  3. Innovation Foundation for Distinguished Students of Fudan University [11-25-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective enrichment of phosphoproteins or phosphopeptides from complex mixtures is essential for MS-based phosphoproteomics, but still remains a challenge. In this article, we described an unprecedented approach to synthesize magnetic mesoporous Fe3O4@mTiO(2) microspheres with a well-defined core/shell structure, a pure and highly crystalline TiO2 layer, high specific surface area (167.1 m(2)/g), large pore volume (0.45 cm(3)/g), appropriate and tunable pore size (8.6-16.4 nm), and high magnetic susceptibility. We investigated the applicability of Fe3O4@mTiO(2) microspheres in a study of the selective enrichment of phosphopeptides. The experiment results demonstrated that the Fe3O4@mTiO(2) possessed remarkable selectivity for phosphopeptides even at a very low molar ratio of phosphopeptides/non-phosphopeptides (1:1000), large enrichment capacity (as high as 225 mg/g, over 10 times as that of the Fe3O4@TiO2 microspheres), extreme sensitivity (the detection limit was at the fmol level), excellent speed (the enrichment can be completed in less than 5 min), and high recovery of phosphopeptides (as high as 93%). In addition, the high magnetic susceptibility allowed convenient separation of the target peptides by magnetic separation. These outstanding features give the Fe3O4@mTiO(2) composite microspheres high benefit for mass spectrometric analysis of phosphopeptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据