4.8 Article

Rough Fibrils Provide a Toughening Mechanism in Biological Fibers

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 1961-1969

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn300130q

关键词

spider silk; collagen; mechanics; fibrils; toughness; finite; element; analysis

资金

  1. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Italy (Direzione Generale per la Promozione e la Cooperazione Culturale)
  2. MDEIE (Quebec)
  3. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante Quebec, Canada
  4. Canada Research Chairs program
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. NIHR Biomedical Research Unit into Musculoskeletal Disease, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre and University of Oxford, and Arthritis Research UK
  7. Cancer Research UK
  8. Versus Arthritis [18887] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spider silk is a fascinating natural composite material. Its combination of strength and toughness is unrivalled in nature, and as a result, it has gained considerable interest from the medical, physics, and materials communities. Most of this attention has focused on the one to tens of nanometer scale: predominantly the primary (peptide sequences) and secondary (beta sheets, helices, and amorphous domains) structure, with some insights into tertiary structure (the arrangement of these secondary structures) to describe the origins of the mechanical and biological performance. Starting with spider silk, and relating our findings to collagen fibrils, we describe toughening mechanisms at the hundreds of nanometer scale, namely, the fibril morphology and its consequences for mechanical behavior and the dissipation of energy. Under normal conditions, this morphology creates a nonslip fibril kinematics, restricting shearing between fibrils, yet allowing controlled local slipping under high shear stress, dissipating energy without bulk fracturing. This mechanism provides a relatively simple target for biomimicry and, thus, can potentially be used to increase fracture resistance in synthetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据