4.8 Article

Higher Recovery and Better Energy Dissipation at Faster Strain Rates in Carbon Nanotube Bundles: An in-Situ Study

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 2189-2197

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn300376j

关键词

vertically aligned carbon nanotubes; compression; mechanical properties; energy storage; recovery

资金

  1. Georgia Institute of Technology Foundation
  2. Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies (ICB) through U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-09-0001]
  3. W. M. Keck Institute
  4. Kavli Nanoscience Institute at Caltech

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report mechanical behavior and strain rate dependence of recoverability and energy dissipation in vertically aligned carbon nanotube (VACNT) bundles subjected to quasi-static uniaxial compression. We observe three distinct regimes in their stress-strain curves for all explored strain rates from 4 x 10(-2) down to 4 x 10(-4) /sec (1) a short initial elastic section followed by (2) a sloped plateau with characteristic wavy features corresponding to buckle formation and (3) densification characterized by rapid stress increase. Load-unload cycles reveal a stiffer response and virtually 100% recoverability at faster strain rates of 0.04/sec, while the response is more compliant at slower rates, characterized by permanent localized budding and significantly reduced recoverability. We propose that it is the kinetics of attractive adhesive interactions between the individual carbon nanotubes within the VACNT matrix that governs morphology evolution and ensuing recoverability. In addition, we report a 6-fold increase In elastic modulus and gradual decrease In recoverability (down to 50%) when VACNT bundles are unloaded from postdensification stage as compared with predensification. Finally, we demonstrate energy dissipation capability, as revealed by hysteresis in load-unload cycles. These findings, together with high thermal and electrical conductivities, position VACNTs in the unattained-as-of-to-date-space in the material property landscape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据