4.8 Article

A Charge-Orbital Balance Picture of Doping in Colloidal Quantum Dot Solids

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 8448-8455

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn303364d

关键词

doping; colloidal quantum dots; PbS nanocrystals; DFT; FET; RBS

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-11-009-21]
  2. Ontario Research Fund Research Excellence Program
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  4. NSERC CGS D scholarship
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Compute Canada
  7. Government of Ontario
  8. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence
  9. University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a framework validated using both modeling and experiment to predict doping in CQD films. In the ionic semiconductors widely deployed in COD films, the framework reduces to a simple accounting of the contributions of the oxidation state of each constituent, including both inorganic species and organic ligands. We use density functional theory simulations to confirm that the type of doping can be reliably predicted based on the overall stoichiometry of the CQDs, largely independent of microscopic geometrical bonding configurations. Studies employing field-effect transistors constructed from CQDs that have undergone various chemical treatments, coupled with Rutherford backscattering and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to provide compositional analysis, allow us to test and confirm the proposed model in an experimental framework. We investigate both p- and n-type electronic doping spanning a wide range of carrier concentrations from 10(16) cm(-3) to over 10(18) cm(-3), and demonstrate reversible switching between p- and n-type doping by changing the COD stoichiometry. We show that the summation of the contributions from all cations and anions within the film can be used to predict accurately the majority carrier type. The findings enable predictable control over majority carrier concentration via tuning of the overall stoichiometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据