4.8 Article

A Simple and Widely Applicable Method to 59Fe-Radiolabel Monodisperse Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for In Vivo Quantification Studies

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 7318-7325

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn3024267

关键词

SPIOs; Fe-59 labeling; in vivo quantification; C-14-oleic acid; blood half-life

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Forschung und Technologie (BMBF, TOMCAT) [01 EZ 0824]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP1313]
  3. Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
  4. European Atherosclerosis Society
  5. BMBF ANCYLOSS project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple, fast efficient and widely applicable method to radiolabel the cores of monodisperse superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs) with Fe-59 was developed. These cores can be used as precursors for a variety of functionalized nanodevices. A quality control using filtration techniques, size-exclusion chromatography, chemical degradation methods, transmission electron microscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging showed that the nanoparticles were stably labeled with Fe-59. Furthermore, the particle structure and the magnetic properties of the SPIOs were unchanged. In a second approach, monodisperse SPIOs stabilized with C-14-oleic add were synthesized, and the stability of this shell labeling was studied. In proof of principle experiments, the Fe-59-SPIOs coated with different shells to make them water-soluble were used to evaluate and compare in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters such as blood half-life. It could also be shown that our radiolabeled SPIOs embedded in recombinant lipoproteins can be used to quantify physiological processes in closer detail than hitherto possible. In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that the Fe-59 label is stable enough to be applied in vivo, whereas the C-14 label is rapidly removed from the iron core and is not adequate for in vivo studies. To obtain meaningful results in in vivo experiments, only Fe-59-labeled SPIOs should he used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据