4.8 Article

Sheddable Ternary Nanoparticles for Tumor Acidity-Targeted siRNA Delivery

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 771-781

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn204240b

关键词

sheddable nanoparticles; pH-responsive; tumor acidity; siRNA delivery; nanotechnology

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Programs) [2010CB934001, 2012CB932502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51125012, 50733003]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2070000008 [WK2070000008]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [SKLSSM201117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug delivery systems for cancer therapy usually need to be sterically stabilized by a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) layer during blood circulation to minimize nonspecific interactions with serum components. However, PEGylation significantly reduces cellular uptake of the delivery systems after they accumulate at the tumor site, which markedly impairs the in vivo antitumor efficiency. Here, we develop a ternary small Interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery system with tumor acidity-activated sheddable PEG layer to overcome the challenge. The sheddable nanoparticle is fabricated by Introducing a tumor acidity-responsive PEGylated anionic polymer to the surface of positively charged polycation/siRNA complexes via electrostatic interaction. We show clear evidence that introducing the PEGylated anionic polymer to the surface of a nanoparticle markedly reduces its nonspecific interactions with protein. We further demonstrate that the nanoparticle Is capable of deshielding the PEG layer at the slightly acidic tumor extracellular microenvironment to facilitate the delivery of siRNA to the tumor cells after accumulation at the tumor site. Accordingly, this promotes the RNA-interfering efficiencies and enhances the Inhibition of tumor growth. Such delivery system with the ability to deshleld the PEG layer at the target tissues has remarkable potential in cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据