4.8 Article

Adverse Biophysical Effects of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles on Natural Pulmonary Surfactant

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 6410-6416

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn2015997

关键词

nanotoxicology; nanoparticle; pulmonary surfactant; surfactant inhibition; surface tension

资金

  1. University of Hawaii at Manoa
  2. Hawaii Community Foundation [44936]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhaled nanoparticles (NPs) must first interact with the pulmonary surfactant (PS) lining layer that covers the entire internal surface of the respiratory tract and plays an important role in surface tension reduction and host defense. Interactions with the PS film. determine the, subsequent clearance, retention, and translocation of the inhaled NPs and, hence their potential toxicity. To date, little Is known how NPs interact with PS, and whether or not NPs have adverse effects on the biophysical function of PS. We found,a time-dependent toxicological effect of hydroxyapatite NPs (HA-NPs) on a natural PS, Infasurf, and the time scale of surfactant inhibition after particle exposure was comparable to the turnover period of surfactant metabolism. Using a variety of in vitro biophysicochemical characterization techniques, we have determined the inhibition mechanism to be due to protein adsorption onto the HA-NPs: Consequently, depletion of surfactant proteins from phospholipid vesicles caused conversion of original large vesicles-into much smaller vesicles with poor surface activity. These small vesicles; in turn, inhibited biophysical function of surfactant films after adsorption at the air-water interface. Cytotoxicity study found that the HA-NPs at the studied concentration were benign to human bronchial. epithelial cells, thereby highlighting the Importance of evaluating biophysical effect of NPs on PS. The NP-PS interaction mechanism revealed by this study may not only provide new insight into the toxicological study of nanoparticles but also shed light on the feasibility of NP-based pulmonary drug delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据