4.8 Article

A Binary Functional Substrate for Enrichment and Ultrasensitive SERS Spectroscopic Detection of Folic Acid Using Graphene Oxide/Ag Nanoparticle Hybrids

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 6425-6433

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn201606r

关键词

graphene oxide/Ag nanoparticle hybrids; folic acid; SEAS detection; serum

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21075120, 20820102037]
  2. 973 Project [2009CB930100, 2010CB933600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein graphene oxide/Ag nanoparticle hybrids (GO/PDDA/AgNPs) were fabricated according to a self-assembly procedure. Using the obtained GO/PDDA/AgNPs as SERS substrates, an ultrasensitive and label-free detection of folic acid in water. and serum was demonstrated based on the inherent SERS spectra of folic acid. The modified graphene oxide exhibited strong enrichment of folic acid due to the electrostatic interaction, and the self-assembled Ag nanoparticles greatly enhanced the SERS spectra of folic acid, both of which led to an ultrahigh sensitivity. Therefore, although the SERS enhancement of p-ATP on GO/PDDA/AgNPs was weaker than that on Ag nanoparticles, the SERS signals of folic add on GO/PDDA/AgNPs were much stronger than that on Ag nanoparticles. To improve the detection, the concentration of GO/PDDA/AgNPs was optimized to reduce background of the graphene oxide: The SERS spectra of the folic add showed that the minimum detected concentration of folic acid in water was as low as 9 nM with a linear response range from 9 to 180 nM. To estimate the feasibility of the detection method based on GO/PDDA/AgNPs for the practical applications, diluted serum containing different concentrations of folic acid was taken as real samples. It was established that the sensitivity and the linear range for the folic add in serum were comparable to that In water. This ultrasensitive and label-free SERS detection of folic acid based on GO/PDDA/AgNPs offers great potential for practical applications of medicine and biotechnology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据