4.8 Article

Cantilever Array Sensors Detect Specific Carbohydrate-Protein Interactions with Picomolar Sensitivity

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 3670-3678

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn103626q

关键词

cantilever array sensors; glycomics; nanomechanics; biosensors; cyanovirin-N

资金

  1. ERA
  2. NCCR-Nanoscale Science
  3. Center for Nano Science (CeNS)
  4. excellence cluster Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM)
  5. elite network of Bavaria
  6. Walther-Meissner-Institute
  7. Bavarian Academy of Science and Humanities
  8. ETH Zurich
  9. Swiss National Fonds (SNF)
  10. Max-Planck-Society
  11. [NRP47]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in carbohydrate sequencing technologies have revealed the tremendous complexity of the glycome. This complexity reflects the structural and chemical diversity of carbohydrates and is greater than that of proteins and oligonucleotides. The next step in understanding the biological function of carbohydrates requires the identification and quantification of carbohydrate interactions with other biomolecules, in particular, with proteins. To this end, we have developed a cantilever array biosensor with a self-assembling carbohydrate-based sensing layer that selectively and sensitively detects carbohydrate protein binding interactions. Specifically, we examined binding of mannosides and the protein cyanovirin-N, which binds and blocks the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Cyanovirin-N binding to immobilized oligomannosides on the cantilever resulted In mechanical surface stress that Is transduced into a mechanical force and cantilever bending. The degree and duration of cantilever deflection correlates with the interaction's strength, and comparative binding experiments reveal molecular binding preferences. This study establishes that carbohydrate-based cantilever biosensors are a robust, label-free, and scalable means to analyze carbohydrate-protein interactions and to detect picomolar concentrations of carbohydrate-binding proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据