4.8 Article

CdSe Quantum Dot-Fullerene Hybrid Nanocomposite for Solar Energy Conversion: Electron Transfer and Photoelectrochemistry

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 9421-9427

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn204350w

关键词

solar cell; quantum dots; fullerene; electron transfer; photoelectrochemistry

资金

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20104010100620]
  3. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20104010100620] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposite systems that enable efficient solar energy conversion has been important for applications in solar cell research. Nanostructured carbon-based systems, in particular C-60, offer attractive strategies to collect and transport electrons generated in a light harvesting assembly. We have assembled CdSe-C-60 nanocomposites by chemically linking CdSe quantum dots (QDs) with thiol-functionalized C-60. The photoinduced charge separation and collection of electrons in CdSe QD-C-60 nanocomposites have been evaluated using transient absorption spectroscopy and photoelectrochemical measurements. The rate constant for electron transfer between excited CdSe QD and C-60 increased with the decreasing size of the CdSe QD (7.9 x 10(9) s(-1) (4.5 nm), 1.7 x 10(10) s(-1) (3.2 nm), and 9.0 x 10(10) s(-1) (2.6 nm)). Slower hole transfer and faster charge recombination and transport events were found to dominate over the forward electron injection process, thus limiting the deliverance of maximum power in CdSe QD-C-60-based solar cells. The photoinduced charge separation between CdSe QDs and C-60 opens up new design strategies for developing light harvesting assemblies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据