4.8 Article

Scalable Complementary Logic Gates with Chemically Doped Semiconducting Carbon Nanotube Transistors

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 2369-2375

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn200270e

关键词

random network CNT array; semiconducting carbon nanotubes; chemical n-doping; inkjet printing; CMOS logic gates; high yield

资金

  1. MEST [R31-2008-000-10029-0]
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) [10031734]
  3. Samsung Mobile Display Co.
  4. MEST in Korea [2010-00429]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10031734] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Use of random network carbon nanotube (CNT) transistors and their applications to complementary logic gates have been limited by several factors such as control of CNT density, existence of metallic CNTs producing a poor yield of devices, absence of stable n-dopant and control of precise position of the dopant, and absence of a scalable and cost-effective fabrication process. Here, we report a scalable and cost-effective fabrication of complementary logic gates by precisely positioning an air stable n-type dopant; viologen, by inkjet printing on a separated semiconducting CNTs network. The obtained CNT transistors showed a high yield of nearly 100% with an on/off ratio of greater than 10(3) in an optimized channel length (similar to 9 mu m). The n-doped semiconducting carbon nanotube transistors showed a nearly symmetric behavior in the on/off current and threshold voltage with p-type transistors. CMOS inverter, NAND, and NOR logic gates were integrated on a HfO2/Si substrate using the n/p transistor arrays. The gain of inverter is extraordinarily high, which is around 45, and NAND and NOR logic gates revealed excellent output on and off voltages. These series of whole processes were conducted under ambient conditions, which can be used for large-area and flexible thin film technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据