4.8 Article

Analyzing Absorption Backgrounds in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Spectra

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 1639-1648

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn1035922

关键词

SWCNT; single-walled carbon nanotubes; absorption; spectral background; functionalization; ultrasonication

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0809020]
  2. Welch Foundation [C-0807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sources of broad backgrounds in visible-near-IR absorption spectra of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) dispersions are studied through a series of controlled experiment. Chemical functionalization of nanotube sidewalls generates background absorption while broadening and red-shifting the resonant transitions. Extensive ultrasonic agitation induces a similar background component that may reflect unintended chemical changes to the SWCNTs. No major differences are found between spectral backgrounds in sample fractions with average lengths between 120 and 650 nm. Broad background absorption from amorphous carbon Is observed and quantified. Overlapping resonant absorption bands lead to elevated backgrounds from spectral congestion In samples containing many SWCNT structural species. A spectral modeling method is described for separating the background contributions from spectral congestion and other sources. Nanotube aggregation increases congestion backgrounds by broadening the resonant peaks. Essentially no background is seen in sorted pristine samples enriched in a single semiconducting (n,m) species. By contrast, samples enriched in mixed metallic SWCNTs show broad intrinsic absorption backgrounds far from the resonant transitions. The shape of this metallic background component and its absorptivity coefficient are quantitatively assessed. The results obtained here suggest procedures for preparing SWCNT dispersions with minimal extrinsic background absorptions and for quantifying the remaining intrinsic components. These findings should allow improved characterization of SWCNT samples by absorption spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据