4.8 Article

Influence of Alumina Type on the Evolution and Activity of Alumina-Supported Fe Catalysts in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Carpet Growth

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 895-904

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn901700u

关键词

Fe catalyst; alumina support; carbon nanotube carpets; catalyst lifetime; catalyst activity; porosity; ellipsometry

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have studied the lifetime, activity, and evolution of Fe catalysts supported on different types of alumina: (a) sputter deposited alumina films (sputtered/Fe), (b) electron-beam deposited alumina films (e-beam/Fe), (c) annealed e-beam deposited alumina films (annealed e-beam/Fe), (d) alumina films deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD/Fe), and (e) c-cut sapphire (sapphire/Fe). We show that the catalytic behavior, Ostwald ripening, and subsurface diffusion rates of Fe catalyst supported on alumina during water-assisted growth or supergrowth of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) carpets are strongly influenced by the porosity of the alumina support. The catalytic activity increases in the following order: sapphire/Fe < annealed e-beam/Fe < ALD/Fe < e-beam/Fe < sputtered/Fe. With a combination of microscopic and spectroscopic characterization, we further show that the Ostwald ripening rates of the catalysts and the porosity of the alumina support correlate with the lifetime and activity of the catalysts. Specifically, our results reveal that SWNT carpet growth is maximized by very low Ostwald ripening rates, mild subsurface diffusion rates, and high porosity, which is best achieved in the sputtered/Fe catalyst. These results not only emphasize the connection between catalytic activity and particle stability during growth, but guide current efforts aimed at rational design of catalysts for enhanced and controlled SWNT carpet growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据