4.8 Article

Direct Measurements of Heating by Electromagnetically Trapped Gold Nanoparticles on Supported Lipid Bilayers

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 2256-2262

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn901751w

关键词

Gold nanoparticles; heating; optical trapping; molecular partitioning; photothermal effect; lipid bilayer

资金

  1. University of Copenhagen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Absorption of electromagnetic irradiation results in significant heating of metallic nanoparticles, an effect which can be advantageously used in biomedical contexts. Also, metallic nanoparticles are presently finding widespread use as handles, contacts, or markers in nanometer scale systems, and for these purposes it is essential that the temperature increase associated with electromagnetic irradiation is not harmful to the environment. Regardless of whether the heating of metallic nanoparticles is desired or not, it is crucial for nanobio assays to know the exact temperature increase associated with electromagnetic irradiation of metallic nanoparticles. We performed direct measurements of the temperature surrounding single gold nanoparticles optically trapped on a lipid bilayer, a biologically relevant matrix. The lipid bilayer had incorporated fluorescent molecules which have a preference for either fluid or gel phases. The heating associated with electromagnetic radiation was measured by visualizing the melted footprint around the irradiated particle. The effect was measured for individual gold nanoparticles of a variety of sizes and for a variety of laser powers. The temperatures were highly dependent on particle size and laser power, with surface temperature increments ranging from a few to hundreds of degrees Celsius. Our results show that by a careful choice of gold nanoparticle size and strength of irradiating electromagnetic field, one can control the exact particle temperature. The method is easily applicable to any type of nanoparticle for which the photothermal effect is sought to be quantified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据