4.8 Article

Epitaxy of Ge Nanowires Grown from Biotemplated Au Nanoparticle Catalysts

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 1209-1217

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn901664r

关键词

biotemplates; S-layer proteins; nanoparticles; nanowires; germanium; vapor-liquid-solid; chemical-vapor-deposition

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-0403990, ECS-0335765, DMR0520404]
  2. U.S. DOE
  3. NNSA
  4. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at Los Alamos National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semiconductor nanowires (NWs) are being actively investigated due to their unique functional properties which result from their quasi-one-dimensional structure, However, control over the crystallographic growth direction, diameter, location, and morphology of high-density NWs is essential to achieve the desirable properties and to integrate these NWs into miniaturized devices. This article presents evidence for the suitability of a biological templated catalyst approach to achieve high-density, epitaxial growth of NWs via the vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) mechanism. Bacterial surface-layer protein lattices from Deinococcus radiodurans were adsorbed onto germanium substrates of (111), (110), and (100) crystallographic orientations and used to template gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) of different diameters. Orientation-controlled growth of GeNWs was achieved from very small size (5-20 nm) biotemplated AuNP catalysts on all of the substrates studied. Biotemplated GeNWs exhibited improved morphologies, higher densities (NW/mu m(2)), and more uniform length as compared to GeNWs grown from nontemplated AuNPs on the substrate surfaces, The results offer an integrated overview of the interplay of parameters such as catalyst size, catalyst density, substrate crystallographic orientation, and the presence of the protein template in determining the morphology and growth direction of GeNWs. A comparison between templated and nontemplated growth provides additional insight into the mechanism of VLS growth of biotemplated NWs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据