4.8 Article

Polymer-Functionalized Nanodiamond Platforms as Vehicles for Gene Delivery

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 2609-2616

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn900865g

关键词

nanodiamonds; gene delivery; nanocarrier; transfection; low molecular weight polyethyleneimine (LMW PEI)

资金

  1. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [CMMI-0846323]
  2. National Science Foundation Mechanics of Materials program [CMMI-0856492]
  3. V Foundation for Cancer Research V Scholars Award
  4. National Science Foundation Center for Scalable and Integrated NanoManufacturing (SINAM [DMI-0327077]
  5. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation
  6. National Science Foundation National Center for Learning & Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering (NCLT)
  7. National Institutes of Health [U54 A1065359]
  8. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0856492, 0846323, 0751621] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene therapy holds great promise for treating diseases ranging from inherited disorders to acquired conditions and cancers. Nonetheless, because a method of gene delivery that is both effective and safe has remained elusive, these successes were limited. Functional nanodiamonds (NDs) are rapidly emerging as promising carriers for next-generation therapeutics with demonstrated potential. Here we introduce NDs as vectors for in vitro gene delivery via surface-immobilization with 800 Da polyethyleneimine (PEI800) and covalent conjugation with amine groups. We designed PEI800-modified NDs exhibiting the high transfection efficiency of high molecular weight PEI (PEI25K), but without the high cytotoxicity inherent to PEI25K. Additionally, we demonstrated that the enhanced delivery properties were exclusively mediated by the hybrid ND-PEI800 material and not exhibited by any of the materials alone. This platform approach represents an efficient avenue toward gene delivery via DNA-functionalized NDs, and serves as a rapid, scalable, and broadly applicable gene therapy strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据