4.8 Article

Molecular Dendritic Transporter Nanoparticle Vectors Provide Efficient Intracellular Delivery of Peptides

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 402-410

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn800679z

关键词

dendritic molecular transporter; peptide delivery; nanomedicine; nanoparticle; macromolecular building blocks; transport across biological barrier; nanobiotechnology

资金

  1. Vanderbilt University (VINSE, Vanderbilt Institute of Nanoscale Science and Engineering)
  2. Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology (VICB, pilot grant)
  3. National Science Foundation NSF [CHE 0645737]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the synthesis of a modular delivery system that is composed of two main macromolecular building blocks, dendritic molecular transporter molecules and a polymeric scaffold in a size dimension of 5 - 10 nm. The conjugated dendritic molecular transporter units proved to be critical for the delivery of the polymer nanoparticle into 3T3 cells and illustrates the dendritic molecular transporter promoted intracellular uptake of polymer particles derived from intramolecular chain collapse processes. In a sequence of modification steps, pyridinyldithio linker was introduced to undergo thiol-disulfide exchange reactions with peptide sequences containing cysteine amino add units to furnish peptide-nanoparticle conjugates with cleavable disulfide linkers. The intracellular uptake of the nanoparticle conjugates and the delivery of the peptidic cargo were studied via dual labeling of the nanoparticle with Alexa Fluor 568 dye and fluorescein (FITC) markers on the peptide in mammalian cell lines such as NIH 3T3 cells via confocal microscopy. In this work, we have demonstrated the assembly of a novel nanoscopic delivery system in which the conjugated dendritic molecular transporter molecules facilitated the rapid cellular uptake of a nanoparticle-peptide conjugate with up to 25 copies of peptidic cargo to establish new venues for the implementation of protein and oligonucleotide drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据