4.6 Article

Combined Plasma Biomarkers for Diagnosing Mild Cognition Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 1530-1536

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cn400129p

关键词

Immunomagnetic reduction; plasma; biomarkers; mild cognition impairment; Alzheimer's disease

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [102-2112-M-003-017, 102-2923-M-003-001, 102-2120-M-168-001, 102-2112-M-168-001, 102-2221-E-003-008-MY2, 101-2221-E-003-005]
  2. Department of Health [DOH101-TD-N-111-004, DOH100-TD-N-111-008, DOH100-TD-PB-111-TMO22]
  3. Ministry of Economic Affairs of Taiwan [101-EC-17-A-17-I1-0074, 1Z970688, 1Z0990415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly sensitive immunoassay, the immunomagnetic reduction, is used to measure several biomarkers for plasma that is related to Alzheimer's disease (AD). These biomarkers include A beta-40, A beta-42, and tau proteins. The samples are composed of four groups: healthy controls (n = 66), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 22), very mild dementia (n = 23), and mild-to-serve dementia, all due to AD (n = 22). It is found that the concentrations of both A beta-42 and tau protein for the healthy controls are significantly lower than those of all of the other groups. The sensitivity and the specificity of plasma A beta-42 and tau protein in differentiating MCI from AD are all around 0.9 (0.88-0.97). However, neither plasma A beta-42 nor tau-protein concentration is an adequate parameter to distinguish MCI from AD. A parameter is proposed, which is the product of plasma A beta-42 and tau-protein levels, to differentiate MCI from AD. The sensitivity and specificity are found to be 0.80 and 0.82, respectively. It is concluded that the use of combined plasma biomarkers not only allows the differentiation of the healthy controls and patients with AD in both the prodromal phase and the dementia phase, but it also allows AD in the prodromal phase to be distinguished from that in the dementia phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据