4.6 Article

Benzothiophene Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Provide Neuroprotection by a Novel GPR30-Dependent Mechanism

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 256-268

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cn100106a

关键词

estrogen; SERM; GPCR; GPR30; neuroprotection; ischemic stroke

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [CA102590]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical benzothiophene SERM (BT-SERM) raloxifene was compared with estrogens in protection of primary rat neurons against oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD). Structure-activity relationships for neuroprotection were determined for a family of BT-SERMs displaying a spectrum of ER alpha and ER beta binding affinity and agonist/antagonist activity, leading to discovery of a neuroprotective pharmacophore, present in the clinically relevant SERMS, raloxifene, and desmethylarzoxifene (DMA), for which submicromolar potency was observed for neuroprotection. BT-SERM neuroprotection did not correlate with binding to ER or classical ER activity; however, both the neuroprotective SEEMS and estrogens were shown, using pharmacological probes, to activate the same kinase signaling cascades. The antiestrogen ICI 182,780 inhibited the actions of estrogens but not those of BT-SERMs, whereas antagonism of the G-protein coupled receptor, GPR30, was effective for both SERMs and estrogens. Since SEEMS have antioxidant activity, ER-independent mechanisms were studied using the classical phenolic antioxidants, BHT and Trolox, and the Nrf2-dependent cytoprotective electrophile, sulforaphane. However, neuroprotection by these agents was not sensitive to GPR30 antagonism. Collectively, these data indicate that the activity of neuroprotective BT-SERMs is GPR30-dependent and ER-independent and not mediated by antioxidant effects. Comparison of novel BT-SERM derivatives and analogues identified a neuroprotective pharmacophore of potential use in design of novel neuroprotective agents with a spectrum of ER activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据