4.6 Article

Transbuccal Delivery of CNS Therapeutic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and In Vitro Permeation Studies

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 2, 期 11, 页码 676-683

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cn200078m

关键词

Buccal mucosa; central nervous system (CNS); encephalin; dendrimer; transbuccal delivery; nanomedicine

资金

  1. NIH [R21NS063200]
  2. NIH-NCI Cancer Center [P30 CA016059]
  3. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, and Massey Cancer Center of Virginia Commonwealth University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work utilized polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer G4.5 as the underlying carrier to construct central nervous system (CNS) therapeutic nanoparticles and explored the buccal mucosa as an alternative absorption site for administration of the dendritic nanoparticles. Opioid peptide DPDPE was chosen as a model CNS drug. It was coupled to PAMAM dendrimer G4.5 with polyethylene glycol (PEG) (i.e., PEG-G4.5-DPDPE) or with PEG and transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody OX26 (i.e., OX26-PEG-G4.5-DPDPE). The therapeutic dendritic nanoparticles labeled with 5-(amino-acetamido) fluorescein (AAF) were studied for transbuccal transport using a vertical Franz diffusion cell system mounted with porcine buccal mucosa. For comparison, AAF-labeled PAMAM dendrimers G3.5 and G4.5 and fluorescein isothiocynate (FITC)-labeled G3.0 and G4.0 were also tested for transbuccal delivery. The permeability of PEG-G4.5 (AAF)-DPDPE and OX26-PEG-G4.5(AAF)-DPDPE were on the order of 10(-7)-10(-6) cm/s. Coadministration of bile salt sodium glycodeoxycholate (NaGDC) enhanced the permeability of dendritic nanoparticles by multiple folds. Similarly, a multifold increase of permeability of dendritic nanoparticles across the porcine buccal mucosal resulted from the application of mucoadhesive gelatin/PEG semi-interpenetrating network (sIPN). These results indicate that transbuccal delivery is a possible route for administration of CNS therapeutic nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据