4.6 Review

Drugging Topoisomerases: Lessons and Challenges

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 82-95

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cb300648v

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Cancer Research [Z01 BC 0006161]
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC006161, Z01BC006161, ZIABC006150] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topoisomerases are ubiquitous enzymes that control DNA supercoiling and entanglements. They are essential during transcription and replication, and topoisomerase inhibitors are among the most effective and most commonly used anticancer and antibacterial drugs. This review consists of two parts. In the first part (Lessons), it gives background information on the catalytic mechanisms of the different enzyme families (6 different genes in humans and 4 in most bacteria), describes the interfacial inhibition by which topoisomerase-targeted drugs act as topoisomerase poisons, and describes clinically relevant topoisomerase inhibitors. It generalizes the interfacial inhibition principle, which was discovered from the mechanism of action of topoisornerase inhibitors, and discusses how topoisomerase inhibitors kill cells by trapping topoisomerases on DNA rather than by classical enzymatic inhibition. Trapping protein DNA complexes extends to a novel mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors and could be applied to the targeting of transcription factors. The second part of the review focuses on the challenges for discovery and precise use of topoisomerase inhibitors, including targeting topoisornerase inhibitors using chemical coupling and encapsulation for selective tumor delivery, use of pharmacodynarnic biomarkers to follow drug activity, complexity of the response determinants for anticancer activity and patient selection prospects of rational combinations with DNA repair inhibitors targeting tyrosyl-DNA-phosphodiesterases 1 and 2 (TDP1 and TDP2) and PARP, and the unmet need to develop inhibitors for type IA enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据