4.6 Article

Structure of Mycobacterial β-Oxidation Trifunctional Enzyme Reveals Its Altered Assembly and Putative Substrate Channeling Pathway

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 1063-1073

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cb400007k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [24300431]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of tuberculosis is increasing due to the appearance of new drug-resistant variants. A thorough understanding of the disease organism is essential in order to create more effective drugs. In an attempt to understand better the poorly studied lipid metabolism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), we identified and characterized its fatty acid beta-oxidation complex (trifunctional enzyme (TFE)). TFE is an alpha(2)beta(2) complex consisting of two types of polypeptides catalyzing three of the four reactions of the beta-oxidation of fatty acids. The kinetic constants (k(cat) and K-m) show that the complexed a chain is more active than the individual alpha chain. Crystal structures of Mtb TFE (mtTFE) reveal that the quaternary assembly is strikingly different from the already known Pseudomonas fragi TFE (pfTFE) assembly due to the presence of a helical insertion (LA5) in the mtTFE-beta subunit. This helical insertion prevents the pfTFE mode of assembly, as it would clash with helix H9A of the TFE-alpha chain. The mtTFE assembly appears to be more rigid and results in a different substrate channeling path between the alpha and the beta subunits. Structural comparisons suggest that the mtTFE active sites can accommodate bulkier fatty acyl chains than in pfTFE. Although another thiolase (FadA2), more closely related to human TFE-beta/thiolase, is present in the Mtb genome, it does not form a complex with mtTFE-alpha. Extensive phylogenetic analyses show that there are at least four TFE subfamilies. Our studies highlight the molecular properties of mtTFE, significantly extending the structural knowledge on this type of very interesting multifunctional enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据