4.6 Article

Small Molecule Microarrays of RNA-Focused Peptoids Help Identify Inhibitors of a Pathogenic Group I Intron

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 299-307

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cb800313m

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM079235, R01 GM079235-01A2, R01 GM 079235] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptoids that inhibit the group I intron RNA from Candida albicans, an opportunistic pathogen that kilts immunocompromised hosts, have been identified using microarrays. The arrayed peptoid library was constructed using submonomers with moieties similar to ones found in small molecules known to bind RNA. Library members that passed quality control analysis were spotted onto a microarray and screened for binding to the C albicans group I intron ribozyme. Each ligand binder identified from microarray-based screening inhibited self-splicing in the presence of 1 mM nucleotide concentration of bulk yeast tRNA with IC50's between 150 and 2200 mu M. The binding signals and the corresponding IC50's were used to identify features in the peptoids that predispose them for RNA binding. After statistical analysis of the peptoids' structures that bind, a second generation of inhibitors was constructed using these important features; all second generation inhibitors have improved potencies with IC50's of < 100 mu M. The most potent inhibitor is composed of one phenylguanidine and three tryptamine submonomers and has an IC50 of 31 mu M. This compound is 6-fold more potent than pentamidine, a clinically used drug that inhibits self-splicing. These results show that (i) modulators of RNA function can be identified by designing RNA-focused chemical libraries and screening them via microarray; (ii) statistical analysis of ligand binders can identify features in leads that predispose them for binding to their targets; and (iii) features can then be programmed into second generation inhibitors to design ligands with improved potencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据