4.8 Article

Nanostructured Li-Rich Fluoride Coated by Ionic Liquid as High Ion-Conductivity Solid Electrolyte Additive to Suppress Dendrite Growth at Li Metal Anode

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 40, 页码 34322-34331

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b12579

关键词

electrolyte additive; nanostructured fluoride; solid electrolyte; ionic liquid; Li dendrite suppression; Li metal batteries

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0901600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772313, U1830113]
  3. Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. Thousand Talents Program of Shanghai

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blending additive with electrolyte is a facile and effective method to suppress anode dendrite growth in Li metal batteries (LMBs), especially when a LiF-rich solid electrolyte interface (SEI) is formed as a consequence of additive decomposition or deposition. However LiF still suffers from poor bulk ion conductivity as well as the difficult access to tailored nanostructure. Exploring new Li fluoride of high Li-ion conductivity as SEI component is still a big challenge in view of the lacking of desired structure prototype or mineral phase. Here, we propose a Li-rich Li(3)AIF(6) derivative from cryolite phase as solid electrolyte additive, which is characterized by textured nanoporous morphology and ionic liquid coating. Its room temperature ion conductivity is as high as similar to 10(-5) S/cm with a low activation energy of 0.29 eV, the best level among fluoride-based solid electrolytes. These features guarantee a homogenization of Li+ fluxing through bulk and grain boundary of Li3AlF6-rich SEI and reinforce the effect on Li dendrite suppression. Li(3)AIF(6) additive enables a stable cyclability of Li parallel to Li symmetric cells for at least 100 cycles even under a high areal capacity of 3 mA h/cm(2) and a significant improvement on capacity retention for various LMBs based on LiFePO4, FeS2, and S cathodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据